Hi Stefan, as I replied previously I think the way you are enhancng LyX for
macros is brilliant. The problem is I do not see a single one of your
enhancements in LyX 1.5x. When can we expect to see your creativity
incorporated into the product????

Regards

Mark Kortink
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: 0419-250-403


-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Schimanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 11 June 2007 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Suggested improvements for LyX macros


Please take a look at my new macro implementation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68Gys4rp3u4

Make it fullscreen while watching to see what's going on. Some points  
you give should be solved by that.

Stefan

Am 11.06.2007 um 06:36 schrieb Mark Kortink:

> Hi
>
> Below are some suggestions for improving macros in LyX. As a user
> it has
> taken many hours of going through the poor user documentation and  
> various
> LaTeX manuals and editors trying to figure out how to get them  
> working and
> then why they don't work, very frustrating! Hopefully these  
> suggestions can
> be incorporated into some release because I have given up on macros  
> even
> though I eventually got them working and they would be extremely  
> useful if
> they worked in such a way to make life easier, even working in a  
> simple way
> would be better..
>
> 1. In the user guide:
> - do not use the name "macro" or "macrowarg" as the example macro
> names,
> guaranteed to confuse.
> - show all the steps in sequence and what it looks like on screen,  
> don't
> give examples of output without showing the input. Step 1, enter the
> "math-macro mname n" in the minibuffer then step 2, type the LaTeX  
> defs into
> the blue boxes which defines the macros so it can be used then step  
> 3, use
> it over and over by going into math mode and typing \mname and  
> entering the
> argument values after the m: placeholders. You get the idea.
> - I found after much pain that you can't put #n, you have to escape  
> it like
> \#n, this is not documented and should not be the case anyhow, #n  
> is the
> standard.
>
> 2. Fix the way they work and look on screen
> - When values have been supplied for the argument display the result 
> WYSIWYM. When the user clicks on the macro to edit its values
> revert back to
> edit mode with the arguments lists 1:, 2:, etc as now.
>
> 3. The big one, allow \newcommand and \DeclareMathOperator to be
> defined in
> the preamble, even if you have to follow some LyX conventions, they  
> need to
> be able to be imported from a file.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark Kortink
> e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> p: 0419-250-403
>


Reply via email to