Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Except that their would be the real bold and the bold-as-strong. In my >> mind, it is even worse than adding a real Bold icon in the toolbar. > > Where is the "real bold" coming from? We will only be providing strong > (which does bold right now, but semantically it's strong). When we add > strong as a charstyle, then we translate all bolds in the .lyx file to > strong. If a user chooses to add "real bold" this would be through > ERT, which would not be affected by the lyx2lyx conversion.
Like we support both emph and italics, we should support both strong and bold. The difference is in advocating the use of the first sort and hiding a bit the second one. JMarc
