On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:17:32PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Thursday 04 October 2007 21:05:58 Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Well... then what about > > > > <par> ....<begin>emph</begin>...<begin>strong</begin>.. > > ....<end>emph</end>.....<end>strong</end>... </pat> > > > > This is 1:1 translatable to the structure above _and_ is more robust > > under manual editing. > > I find your exchange highly amusing because somehow you two seem to > imply that the current lyx file format is robust under manual > editing. :-)
I might have lost part of my skills in that area but I don't think I ever uses LyX internal search-and-replace much. For that I'd almost always used vi on the .lyx file. And that possibility would indeed be lost if there were numerical indices coded in the format. My second proposal retains that option. > I have several recipes to crash lyx changing selected parts of the > lyx file, even innocent parts. :-) Oh, sure. But you learn what not to do rather quickly. Andre'
