Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree with that. Just let people choose what they want. Font > attribute should not become insets and people should not be forced to > use charstyle if they really want to use Font attribute.
But there are two different things: * semantic vs explicit marking * font-like extent versus inset. The first one is the one that counts. The second one is an implementation issue. Chartstyles could have been implemented as part of font setting. It is a design choice. And I happen to think (not that it matters much, so I ma going to shut up on this issue too) that the inset implementation is not ready (but the solutions are not obvious). JMarc
