Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We recently also had a "updateLabel()" creep. By now there are 38 > instances of updateLabels() in the code. This somehow does not > sound right.
sigh. JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We recently also had a "updateLabel()" creep. By now there are 38 > instances of updateLabels() in the code. This somehow does not > sound right.
sigh. JMarc