On Friday 07 September 2007 10:03:49 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > This is "funny". If this cvslog list is useful, I want to receive *all* > commit logs, not only the ones of people that decide to subscribe. So it's > the svn server that should send the messages, not the commiters. > > And I still don't understand why there are two cvs lists. Does lyx-cvs get > all commit logs, or also just a "selection"? Why don't all of you use > lyx-cvs instead of cvslog?
You can send messages to cvslog but not to lyx-cvs. At least that was the original motivation as far as I can remember. > A/ -- José Abílio
