On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:23:46PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote: > > I agree that LyX should start, no matter if the .lst-files are empty and > > then take care of them, > > Jose and Jurgen, > > I propose that we apply the attached patch to partially solve this > problem. It allows lyx to start even when textclasslist is empty. If > lyx is started like this, only reconfigure (and quit) is allowed. This > gives users a second chance to configure lyx if initial configuration > fails.
I don't think that this is the right fix. If configure failed previously, most probably it will fail again, so what is fixed here? -- Enrico
