On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:34:40PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:45:15 Helge Hafting wrote: > > That's a really stupid argument. Thw word "static" has too many meanings, > > so lets disable some of them ??? The sane thing would be a > > clean rename from "static" to several new keywords - one for each > > use. And to keep the existing nice functionality. > > Don't forget that: > > - it needs to retain compatibility with C > - it needs to retain compatibility with old code
Well, if that is considered important (which I agree with, but that's not the point), declaring it 'deprecated' is not really helpful. Andre'
