Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
A second
reason is that qmake has two abilities than none of the other three
systems have: It knows about Qt, so no special code for .ui or such
needed, and it has _real_ MSVS integration including project management,
integrated help, designer and so on based on .pro files as primary
source of information.
Are you sure that those feature are available in the open source version
of Qt?
Hm... not sure. I've been using the commercial version of Qt for three
years and now in the new job some in-house version from which both the
commercial and the OS versions are build. I think I never used the
OS version on Windows myself, so I don't really know how much it differs
from the commercial one. I'll try to increase my level of knowledge ;-}
The patched open source version of qt doesn't produce running project files,
only the Makefiles are usable.
The only way to have such project files is to use cmake.
So we should make some effort to rectify this situation rather soonish,
too...
I think cmake could do the same job as scons does, it is only a question
of time and interest.
Andre'
Andre', we could meet for beer and cmake hacking...
Peter
