On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:17:10PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:41:27 +0200 > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:11:49PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > Well, we need to express opinions to reach consensus, don't we? I know > > > that my opinions are in general not shared with old devs but this is my > > > opinion :-) > > > I want more frequent releases, this is the only way IMHO to avoid big > > > destabilization of the tree. If the XML branch is ready for writing > > > _and_ reading, then we should switch now and not wait for another six > > > months. If it is not ready, then I think the time frame for inclusion is > > > already passed. > > > > You may actually have point here. > > > > Andre' > > I didn't expect to be saying this, but hey! Let's take some calculated risk. > José knows what state the XML patch is in, but I would say that even if it > is only 3/4 ready, it should go in -- now. If we keep the tree compilable, it > will all be fixed. Having some version of XML, warts-and-all, will place LyX > closer to the mainstream. It does matter for attracting developer mindshare.
As far as I can tell there was not even a decision on the XML parser yet, not even somethong like a 'list of candidates'. Andre'
