On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:53:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>>While cmake can create MSVC projects, the current implementation does > >>>>not handle all the dependencies like scons does. For example, the > >>>>thesaurus is not supported. To create Windows releases, scons in the > >>>>only option right now. > >>>Umm... sorry if I've asked this before, but I thought the installer > >>>could use a Windows executable of LyX that's been created with any build > >>>system on Windows? > >>Sure. If cmake is able to generate an executable linked to all > >>dependencies, I can use it instead. Currently only scons can do that. > > > >How does an executable look like that's not linked to its dependencies? > >[No joke, I really want to grasp the difference between cmake and scons] > > There's no difference, it's just that Thesaurus is not look for by _our_ > CMake system, that's all. In effect, this means that the thesaurus is > disabled for CMake builds.
Ah.. got it now. Andre'
