Bo Peng wrote:
??? That's the basic idea behind pch. The same thing would happen with
scons I think.
So you think this is acceptable?
For day to day development, yes.
I did not add pch to scons because of
this exact reason. I want a reliable build more than performance.
On the contrary, for development I want performance first. I am sure we
can add a "reliable" option to CMake so that everything is fine when the
time comes for packaging, which doesn't happen everyday in most case. I
know that "scons install" is nice because you can work with your
development build in the final install directory. But quite frankly,
launching LyX in place is fine enough for me. That might be because I
don't use translation at all. Maybe even that can be cured in CMake too.
Abdel.
