On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:35:46PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > That's true for all of us, that's why there is no Qt3 frontend anymore. > > There is no Qt3 frontend anymore because it was brutally murdered.
Poor little thing still lives a zombie life in the repository. Check it out, dool it up, and be happy. > The same holds true for the gtk frontend. If they had stayed in trunk, > maybe we could still have a choice, now no more. And what would this choice buy us except doubled (actually more than doubled) maintanance cost? What kind of feature will this glorious Gtk frontend have that would not be possible with Qt? Apart from that: It is still there. branches/gtkdevel. No activity for 10 months. Not exactly the kind of interest one would expect for a dearlyh needed piece of software. > Now I will stop replying to this thread, because a discussion requires > that both parties are willing to listen, but trying to rewrite history > really annoys me, so I couldn't resist with this last post. This is not about rewriting history, it's just repeating old arguments. Not that it helps much. If _you_ don't invest, don't others expect to do so. Andre'
