On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 09:57:27AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Doesn't docbook require all of the same libraries you are suggesting? Nope, generally it is the responsability of the user to do the translations for the different backends. > I started a thread in linux-kernel on documentation and got mildly > flamed for suggesting LyX. The same person pointed out that there was no > GUI for DocBook. There are, but they are comercial. > It would seem that your suggestion would move us in that direction. The limitations of the lyx support for docbook aren't related to graphics, but if the support improves that is better :+), but the absence of inline styles, a.k.a Logical Characther Styles. The other thing is the knowleadge of the document strucutre that should be enforced, in user-friendly way. The problem with Imlib is that we should require it, and that is not easy specially for the comercial unixs where most of the users are not allowed to install new software. > Jose' ? > Garst -- José
