Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Bo Peng wrote: >>>> Your patch may not be needed at >>>> least for this bug. >>> It will be needed for a forthcoming bugs ;-) >>> As I said, if you are serious about supporting gcc 3, you should do this >>> for all boost signal connection. >> >> I still prefer to fix the bug when I see it, rather than blindly doing >> this for all signals. > > Or the user sees it? It's up to you, we fixed this kind of bugs too many > times already; and each time it requires some investigation. But I don't > use gcc 3.3 so I don't care much ;-)
I agree with Abdel. If the bug is already identified, why leave it lurking? A/
