Le 15 août 07 à 10:02, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Mael Hilléreau wrote:
> > What about my old document that I created without this
option? > > Should I "remake" all notes?
How do you know that _all_ notes should not be checked? Maybe I
wan't a few of them to actually be checked. Or sometimes I want
them all to be checked. I suspect it's difficult to generalize.
Has anyone suggested just putting a few check boxes in the spell
checking dialog, e.g. like this:
[ ] Check all insets
[ ] Check notes
[ ] Check footnotes
[ ] ...
Then let these settings be stored in the document...
IMO, this type of information has nothing to do in the document,
it is a session or a preference thing.
But, except for that, I like your proposal a lot. I think it's
easier to implement than all the other proposal and it doesn't
touch the core (provided you don't store the info in the document
of course). At the end, spell-checking is a frontend thing, nothing
to do with the document contents.
Why do say this is easier to implement than other proposals? That's
exactly what's in my patch (bug 1509) (despite there's also a layout
keyword...) A special inset would be a good complement to deal with
instance level (which in the patch is achieved with branches).
Mael.
