Le 13 août 07 à 01:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I uploaded this patch to bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1509
IMHO it fixes this bug. Please let me know wether it has a chance to
be applied.
FWIW, I looked at the patch and there are a few things I do not like
in there. In particular, it should not be the responsibility of the
inset to look at its contents and decide what can be spell-checked
(especially if it only looks at the first paragraph). However, this is
easily fixable.
Well I don't know... But this an implementation issue.
The real question is to know what we want to do.
Yes! :)
To know what we want, we have to define what are the needs. Here's
what the user needs I have in mind (tell me if I forget smth (maybe
most common are first):
1) The spellchecker always gives me errors which occur into notes,
comments, or disabled branches. I want it to ignore all text into
these containers.
2) I want that the spellchecker ignores this particular region (or
word).
3) I want that the spellchecker ignores all occurrences of this word,
but only into this document.
4) I want to configure the spellchecker very precisely (ignore that
disabled branch, but not this one; ignore this layout unless into
such inset...).
Now, here's how I see the solutions:
1) use spellchecker preference pane and alyouts (almost done, only
the third checkbox is missing).
2) use a "NoSpellcheck" inset (we get the idea, most of issues deal
with the way it's displayed). Perhaps, we could make the negative as
well "Spellcheck", in order to override a "don't spellcheck" default
behavior (not sure it's a good idea...)
3) A list of words into document settings (with add/remove control),
and a button into spellchecker dialog for adding on-the-fly.
4) Not too much support for this (we don't want "everything
customizable"): at this stage one can however play with special
insets, layouts, charstyles or branches...
Mael.
