Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The 1.5 development process was an order of magnitude faster and the > resulting code is much *cleaner* than the 1.4 one. I reckon that this > is because of the increased liberty. I am _not_ going to send patches > for each and every cleanup I'll maybe doing in the 1.6 cycle.
I think you should be able to make a difference between a patch that change LyX workflow from a patch that is just cleanup. Why is that so difficult? We need to draw a line between patches that change conceptual things and patch that just continue n a well understoof direction. > The svn log and trac diff are there to review for all. One commit > can be reverted if it is found bad. This is true for a small commits. But making architectural changes and then reverting them is the sign that something is quite wrong. JMarc
