Mael Hilléreau wrote:
Selon Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
Selon Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want my disabled branches spellchecked. :-/
I write a test with hidden answers. I want to spellcheck everything,
so I can print the answers later without further checking & editing.
That's why there's a checkbox in the preference pane :) (see the patch at
bug
1509).
Helge is right (I'm not sure if this is what he meant or not) in that
there's a difference between Notes and disabled branches. Presumably,
notes are not meant to be output (though even that is not certain,
especially given that it's now very easy to switch between different
kinds of notes, some of which *are* output), whereas inactive branches
*are* meant to be output, just not in every "version" of the document.
So it's very possible for someone to want to spellcheck inactive
branches, but not notes.
Agreed. I have a simple solution: use 2 checkboxes. One for notes, the other for
disabled branches.
This solves the spellchecking of branches. But note that such checkboxes
does not remove the need for marking parts of the document as
non-spellchecked. Because there may very well be lots of
normal text (not in branches, not in notes) that we don't want
spellchecked. For example, a list of computer commands.
If we get a good solution for this, there is the question wether
no spellcheck for branches/notes is necessary, as those too
can be marked "no spellcheck" the same way as other text. Perhaps
it will be a timesaver if there are lots of such notes.
Helge Hafting
