Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 04-Jul-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > hmm I think this change a lot of my code too... but not much.
| >
|
| Well if you worked on the insetcollapsable.[Ch] YES otherwise probably
| no.
I have done some there, because we now have some 6-8 insets that
inherit from insetcollapsable.
|
| >| I'll commit what I have now so you can have a look!
| >
| > Please, do.
| >
|
| Really soon just let me finish something (but before NOW I go for something
| to eat and then I'll commit it)
note that if I beat you to the commit you will have conflicts :-)
| >| BTW.: After this the InsetText should be used ONLY as InsetText!
| >
| > Never subclass from it?
|
| Probably, but we really don't need it as subclass, do we?
(I guess you mean superclass)
No I don't think so.
One thing... can our whole document now be put inside a InsetText?
I am not saying that we should do that...but is it possible?
Lgb
