On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 12:19:18AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>  FYI:
>  http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2543

I don't think this is the same bug.

The bug that gets me worked up is, that after writing a
one line formula, trying to append a second line by ctrl-enter
will spread out pieces of the formula over both lines.

- Martin

 
>  Richard Heck wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:04:06PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >>  
> >>>  Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>>    
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:19:58AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >>>>        
> >>>>>> This causes a lot of frustration to me, because often I only decide
> >>>>>> that an equation has to be multi-line when I'm already half-way
> >>>>>> through typing it. When this happens, I have to type CMD-return, then
> >>>>>> CMD-z to undo the creation of the new line, re-position the cursor,
> >>>>>> and type CMD-return again :-(
> >>>>>>                 
> >>>>> I agree that this isn't the most useful behavior...for me, but
> >>>>> obviously someone did choose this. Andre---do you have a view?
> >>>>>             
> >>>> I think this is pretty old logic and everytime one trie to change
> >>>> something in this area people start crying foul.
> >>>>         
> >>>  Yes, people get used to these sorts of things, and if you change them, 
> >>> they  get upset.
> >>>     
> >>
> >> Yet in this case I agree with Stephen. It didn't use to be
> >> this way, and I find it _really_ exasperating.
> >>   
> > Well, maybe we need a vote. It's easy enough to change.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> 
> 
>  -- 
>  ==================================================================
>  Richard G Heck, Jr
>  Professor of Philosophy
>  Brown University
>  http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
>  ==================================================================
>  Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
>  Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
>  Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
>  http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
> 

Reply via email to