Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here is the most up-to-date version of the patch, with all comments
and such. Bo and I agree it should go into both trunk and branch, as
it solves the problem. ;-) We need one more OK.
Am I right that the changes to setBuffer are not really needed? What
was wrong with the old solution of reading BufferView::buffer()?
Not essential, no, but in working on this earlier, it seemed to me that
setBuffer() should return the then active buffer. It just makes things
neater. It's something I was meaning to do at some point, anyway.
I'll commit this. I take it that's a sort of OK.
Richard
--
==================================================================
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==================================================================
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
