Bo Peng wrote:
Jürgen> to be more precise: if the feature really costs that much, it
Jürgen> is obviously not yet ready. Then I vote for commenting it out
Jürgen> and explain the situation in the code.
I apologize but what 'cost' are you talking about? Is it slow page
up/down with selection?
Exactly.
If so, the easiest method is to, just like the
case of xterm, limit the size of internal selection buffer so that
excessive selection will not be stored.
Yes, that's exactly what I proposed in my solution 2. Hopefully for
1.5.1. I mean, 1.5.0 was supposed to be released yesterday...
Abdel.
