Re: Compilation error

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| This is probably with gcc 2.8.1. However, this is somewhat a valid
| point: wouldn't it be better to define a type like TimeOut::base_type,
| so that we would know that LyXView uses these signals? Or do you plan
| to use slots for other thing than timeout in this class?
| 
| The idea is that we should not have to care about LyXView using
| SigC.

But we have to care since that is how SigC++ works. All classes that
want to connect a member functions to a signal need to inherig from
SigC::Object. Of course we could use static functions but then we do
not gain much over callbacks.

        Lgb