Le 5 juin 07 à 23:06, Andre Poenitz a écrit :
In the long run this certainly would make sense since our homegrown
solution is pretty expensive (checksum of the whole file) compared
to the Qt solution (use system notifications when available, polling
only as fallback).
Can anybody remind me why we use checksums and not modification or
access times? Was that the '2 seconds granularity on FAT problem'?
It would make sense to compute checksum only if the timestamp is
different: it then saves the conversion process in the case no new
modifications exist (i.e. the file was saved but not modified).
Mael.
--
Mael Hilléreau
http://mael.hillereau.free.fr
