On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:07:14AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:12:22PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> 
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:52:25PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > >
> > > So the question is what to do about this. Option (i): Kill the box. If a 
> > > user wants to run dvips -Pwhatever, let h'er enter it into the Printer 
> > > Command box. Option (ii): Keep the box, but add a tooltip along the 
> > > lines I suggested last: Either "Check this box only if you have 
> > > config.<printer> files installed for each printer you use." Or: "If you 
> > > don't know what this does, you don't need it. (See info dvips for help.)"
> > >
> > > Enrico, would that be OK with you?
> > >   
> > >
> > > I think option (ii)a would be correct. Notice that I don't have
> > > multiple resolution printers, so I don't use it myself.
> > >   
> > Here's what I intend to do:
> > (i) Label the button "Adapt output to printer". Anything more 
> > intelligible will encourage neophytes to check this, which would be bad.
> > (ii) Tooltip: "Customizes output to a given printer. Expert option." 
> > Discourages its use, again a good thing.
> > (iii) whatsThis: "Normally, this needs to be checked...." continuing 
> > with stuff about dvips and config.* files.
> > 
> > I also propose to change "Printer name" to "Default printer". That seems 
> > to be what it does. I also propose to re-arrange this dialog a bit. 
> > "Spool options" should be to the right of "spool command", and both of 
> > those should be at the bottom, since the other options affect the main 
> > command. A separator makes it clear that these are not connected with 
> > the other options. I've also added some tooltips for things that didn't 
> > have them.
> > 
> > Large useless patch attached. Also a screenshot. OK?
> 
> I don't see why "Set printer" is any different from "Spool printer".
> If the "Spool command" is "lp", then "-d" should be used to specify
> the printer, otherwise, if "Spool command" is "lpr" then "-P" is to
> be used. (I think you opened a can of worms :)

Please, disregard the above nonsense due to sleep deprivation.

-- 
Enrico

Reply via email to