José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:50:17 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Thanks. What should I do with the Qt4.1 case? Do I remove the assertion
and return '?' or does someone wants to implement the iconv solution?
Could that be placed inside a conditional statement so that it does nothing
from Qt 4.1?
This is already the case, the assertion is placed between #ifdef and is
triggered only for Qt < 4.2.
That way it the bug will be fixed for Qt >= 4.2 and later another fix can be
committed to fix the Qt 4.1 case.
There is nothing to fix for Qt >= 4.2.
Abdel.
