Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I agree but it's more work than my signal based solution
Abdelrazak> which is assured to work in all cases. I tell you what, in
Abdelrazak> order to save the bits Andre is worried about I am going
Abdelrazak> to remove the signal from Inset and transfer them to
Abdelrazak> InsetText and InsetMathHull. In 1.6, we can think of this
Abdelrazak> other solution. But really, my solution is cheap in terms
Abdelrazak> of CPU and it will be cheaper in terms of memory when I do
Abdelrazak> the change described above.
So it is not realted to Helge's comlaint that moving the cursor
produces a high CPU load?
I don't think so. Moving cursor shouldn't trigger any inset destruction.
Abdel.
