Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Abdelrazak> I dared a few months ago and I've cleaned up a lot of the > Abdelrazak> Lexer class. But it was too late in the game and I gave up > Abdelrazak> because of the promised XML transition. > > Yes, but nevertheless the part that reads the .lyx file is weird (the > parts that reads other files is OK-ish). > Can we actually get rid of this? I would assume that the first version of LyX that reads and writes LyXML (tm) will also need to read and write the old LyX format. Right? That fact has made me somewhat puzzled about the issue of merging branches. It seems to me that the current write() routines (in the insets, say) will need to be preserved as writeLyXFormat() routines, and there will need to be new writeLyXML() routines, as well. If so, there's no real conflict.
-- ================================================================== Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/ ================================================================== Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
