On Mon, 28 May 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | + ListingsParam(string const & v, bool o, param_type t,
| > | + string const & i, docstring const & h)
| > | : value_(v), onoff_(o), type_(t), info_(i), hint_(h)
| > | {}
| > | - ///
| > | + /// Validate a paramater.
| > | + /// \retval an empty string if \c par is valid.
| > | + /// \retval otherwise an explanation WRT to \c par
| > | invalidity.
| > | docstring validate(string const & par) const;
| > Are multiline comments usgin '//' really nice? I'd say that /* */ is
| > better suited for multiline comments.
|
| I don't really care.
And suddenly you showed me why I stay away from this list.
The fact that I don't really care if /// or /** is used? Or the fact that I
am not willing to obey you and do this change because, as I said, I don't
really care?
If you stay away from this list because of something as insignificant as
that, this is a problem on your side.
I'd say it's our problem as we greatly benefit from having Lars around.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
