>>>>> "Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> So, if we move Martin's test out of cursorX, we're going to have Dov> to add it in 4 or 5 new places. Very good argument. Thanks for checking. Dov> Finally, (a) Martin's test has been in for a while (since r10513, Dov> 10/2005), I don't know why it's only now that we're questioning Dov> whether this really belongs here or not; Because it is only now that we have RtL-knowledgeable people looking at this code. Martin at the time did the best he could to fix problems reported by users (I think). Butthe RtL code in LyX has been rotting for a long time. JMarc
