Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> Richard Heck wrote: >>>> The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC >>>> (e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is still one open. >>> Instead, I think we should rather make the TOC non buffer-dependant. >> But it's not just the TOC. The real question is: Why should every >> dialog that is buffer dependent, in the sense that we'll have >> problems if the dialog is open and there's no buffer, be closed just >> because we close a buffer? It's safe, yes, but hardly necessary. > If you can prove that no dialog crashes because of that change, I agree. I'll try to run through them all at some point. And I'll post the patch in a more general way and try to get some people to test it.
Richard -- ================================================================== Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/ ================================================================== Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
