Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | José Matos wrote:
> | > | > On Thursday 24 May 2007 19:24:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> | > | >> {
> | > | >> Types const t = type(params);
> | > | >> - return (t == INPUT) or (t == INCLUDE);
> | > | >> + return (t == INPUT) || (t == INCLUDE);
> | > | >> }
> | > | > Why is this?
> |
> | #include <iso646.h> not there.
>
> In C++ iso646.h is not needed to get or/and etc.
when you use gcc
They are proper
> keywords in their own right.
>
> |
>
> | > |
> | > | You mean "_What_ is this?" It surely is not C++ at the first place :-)
> | >
> | > It is C++.
> | > (but not used much)
> | >
> |
> | It is--at least with msvc-- iso 646.
> |
> | So, is it C++?
>
> Yes, it is.
> (but that does not mean that we should use those keywords.)
>
--
Peter Kümmel
