> I think an icon about size is as wrong as an icon about limit placements.

Hmm, I must admit, yes.
But note that it was not the first time we got questions about this icon.

> Personally I
> would think that these things do not belong to the math panel, because
> they should only rarely be used (and many people think they have to
> use them for every other formula).

Yes this is probably the best solution.

> I think I do not agree here, as they are more easily accessible
> than before and they have long names. If someone misuses them, this is
> his problem, don't you think so?

No, because we should guide the user. We cannot expect that normal LyXers read the TeXBook to find out the differences.

> I find them very useful when I don't like
> the default sizes TeX uses in fractions, for example.

Better use the commands \cfrac, \tfrac, etc. in this case.

> I would not use
> them simply for changing the limits style.

But this is not the intention of these commands, they are there to change the style (size and spacings) of whole math constructs and not only parts of it. Therefore there are commands like \cfrac and \nolimits.

Herbert, what is your interpretion of this issue?

regards Uwe


Reply via email to