>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 6:41:19 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> I am repeating myself but, theoretically speaking, pragmatically >> speaking, logically speaking, the inset status is not a document >> information. José> I agree with Abdel here. I see it like that: the current solution was easy to implement, is robust and does not have that many drawbacks. I really doubt it would be worth implementing the same through session. Imagine: you set up carefully your insets to be as you like and sent the document to your co-author; then he cuts-and-pastes a few thing; what is the session data structure that will allow LyX to recognize the right insets and set their status. It looks like a formidable work for a minuscule result. >> I disagree but that's nothing we can change now. José> I agree here as well. :-) This is at least something we can agree on... JMarc
