Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> I'm willing to accept commit access, of course, and I'm even
Dov> willing to be in charge of this stuff, at least for now. But I
Dov> have very little time that I can actually put into LyX --- this
Dov> week I've been putting in way more than I can afford --- so I
Dov> don't want my getting commit access to be under any false
Dov> pretenses. But if it helps, even if I will only commit from time
Dov> to time, then sure, I'd be happy to get access. JMarc?
Well, Abdel has some kind of obsession of giving svn access to
everybody (but don't tell him I said that, he is so touchy) ;) If you
do want access we can do that, but if it is just to please us, I am
not sure it is necessary. Actually, I think that discussing patches
before applying is very very useful, and the impression of efficiency
gained by being able to commit comes at a cost.
That said, I am not opposed.
JMarc
Hi!
I'd like to get commit access if possible, please. Have no fear --- I
will certainly discuss any patches before applying, unless they're
really very very minor (and at least at the beginning, I'll probably ask
about those, too). I probably won't commit much, but there are a few
instances in which I hope that'll keep the load off other developers
just a bit.
Specifically, at the moment these are what I have my eye on:
* RTL crash patch (which Jose seems to agree should go into the beta,
to get testing);
* mark spaces as belonging to foreign language --- which I submitted
last night (again, after having submitted it a month ago for the first
time).
If I get access, could you please just send me a short refresher on the
procedure --- do we still have to update anything besides the commit
log? Does a patch sent to the mailing list with "any objections?", and
which does not receive objections, qualify for commit? etc.
Thanks!
Dov
