>> Mostafa> The question is: which one to use?
>
>You said above that the two packages are fully compatible. Can't we
>require both then?
>
>>
>> Indeed :) Especially sine most of the arabic support is built with
>> arabtex in mind, I guess. Unfortunately, I do not have a good answer
>> to this question.
>
>So, Mostafa's patch cannot be applied as-is? Maybe you could use
>isRequired()/isNeeded() for the package selection?
>
>Abdel.
There are two possibilities to support ArabTeX and ARABI together in LyX:
1) to specify which one we would like to use througout the file
2) to specify that we like to use ArabTeX for some part of the file instead
of ARABI (note that the other way is not possible)
The question is whether we would like to have both of these possibilities.
Abdel, be careful that if you want to provide the Arabic suppot based on
ArabTeX then I am afraid that you should not commit the changes I suggested for
the numbers.
One thing is for sure that for Farsi we only use ARABI and never ArabTeX.
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
