Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> Abdel, you're so touchy! I wasn't saying that we're not getting
Dov> any help, and I really do appreciate your help, on all kinds of
Dov> issues. And Thank you for committing Elazar's patch! It's just
Dov> that we always need even more ;) ... But seriously, I really do
Dov> appreciate the help you've been giving us. :)
Dov> I'm willing to accept commit access, of course, and I'm even
Dov> willing to be in charge of this stuff, at least for now. But I
Dov> have very little time that I can actually put into LyX --- this
Dov> week I've been putting in way more than I can afford --- so I
Dov> don't want my getting commit access to be under any false
Dov> pretenses. But if it helps, even if I will only commit from time
Dov> to time, then sure, I'd be happy to get access. JMarc?
Well, Abdel has some kind of obsession of giving svn access to
everybody (but don't tell him I said that, he is so touchy) ;)
Dov is not anybody... ;-)
If you
do want access we can do that, but if it is just to please us, I am
not sure it is necessary. Actually, I think that discussing patches
before applying is very very useful, and the impression of efficiency
gained by being able to commit comes at a cost.
IMHO, those two arguments are completely orthogonal: Dov, commit access
doesn't mean that you are allowed to commit anything you'd like
(especially on freeze period). You are of course invited to discuss
patch before committing.
Abdel.
