José Matos wrote: > On Sunday 06 May 2007 09:38:48 Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Abdel don't get this complaining about the development process too serious. >> We will see if 1.5 is so bad how all those pessimists claim. > > We have been having this discussion everytime that we are near a stable > release, at least as far as I remember. :-) > >> By the way, I could understand that someone must leave the team short >> before a big release because lack of time, but only because he couldn't >> accept how things evolve, this is really bad style. > > I am sorry Peter, I disagree with you here. Georg has warned us several > times before, he was consistent in all this process and I respect and accept > that.
As said above, I only couldn't accept that someone very deep involved in the development process stops short before a release just because he dislike the current development style, when someone becomes that important then he is responsible and couldn't just leave. But I don't think this is the case for Georg, he starts writing his thesis, and this is much more important for him than LyX, this is totally OK. He should be thankful that the current evolution of the lyx development process makes it more easy to him to leave LyX. ;) > > We made some mistake in the process, and we should recognised and learn > from > them. Not all evolution is naturally good and if want to continue to have fun > and get a useful product out of the door in a reasonable period we have to > change some procedures in our developing methodology. > >> But it seems to be hip to criticize the current development process, >> the only way to become a serious lyx-developer. > > Actually I would say that is the other way around, if you remember Denmark > last October. ;-) > >> Peter > -- Peter Kümmel
