On May 4, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
With this patch, double-clicking a file when LyX isn't running
will start LyX and (apparently) ignore session information about
what other files to load. So the "revert" dialog gets properly
suppressed.
But is this the behavior we want? (I'm not sure it isn't; I'm just
asking.) Would it be preferable to load the double-clicked file
*together with* all other files from the session file?
Yes, this behaviour was expected.
Fine.
It is consistent with the one when you pass filenames at the
command line. Extract from the source code:
void LyX::restoreGuiSession()
{
LyXView * view = newLyXView();
// if some files were specified at command-line we assume that the
// user wants to edit *these* files and not to restore the
session.
if (!pimpl_->files_to_load_.empty()) {
If this behaviour is to be changed, we should change it for both
opening methods IMHO.
Anyway, I think this discussion is orthogonal to the patch. I am
already glad that it works :-)
Me too! -- Thanks.
Bennett
I'll commit it.
Abdel.
