On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:06:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Edwin Leuven wrote: > > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >> Edwin Leuven wrote: > >>> i have switched to svn for my daily work now (don't miss good old > >>> 1.4.3 for one second!!) > >>> > >>> however, i *strongly* suggest that we revert this patch: > >>> > >>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17639 > >>> > >>> and get rid of the antialiasing in formulas for the following two > >>> reasons: > >>> > >>> 1. the result is actually not nice, but rather fuzzy > >>> > >>> 2. the mixing of antialiased text with non-antialiased text is really > >>> ugly > >> > >> What are you talking about? This commit was about antialiasing of > >> lines polylines and arcs that are used in symbols like brackets or > >> sqrt. Nothing to do with text. > > > > s\text\elements\g > > > > my point is; it is ugly (the result is not very nice) and also > > inconsistent: > > > > when i enter ordinary parentheses they are not antialiased, when i enter > > the scaleable ones, they are. > > Maybe you should turn on text antialiasing on your system...
I agree with Edwin that this is a bad hack and should be reverted. If I choose to not do antialiasing, LyX should respect my wish. > > integrals are not antialiased, square roots are. > > > > horizontal arrows: the stem is unantialiased, the arrow point is > > antialiased. > > > > etc > > > > i am sorry, but it looks like a mess... > > We could make this optional I guess or enable it only if text > antialiasing is turned on otherwise. I think Qt can give use this > information. It's an ugly hack and should be reverted, IMHO. -- Enrico
