Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Taking a look at the names of the frontends/qt4 files >> -after all the renaiming- I'm a bit disappointed still >> seeing Q* and QL* classes. Q* is the name of Trolltech >> names, and we should not introduce our Q classes. >> And why do we need QL? It's like QtBasedClassUsedInLyX* >> but isn't this clear by the location of the file >> lyx-project/.../trunk/src/frontends/qt4? >> >> Are there plans to rename these files and classes too? >> It seems NOW is the time to do it. > > We all agree that this is bad naming. In 1.6, I plan (and Richard > offered me some help) to progressively migrate the dialogs to _my_ MVC > framework. But blindly removing QFoo to Foo will create file name clashes.
As written in my last mail this is not the case for all Q files. > So if you really want to proceed with the renaming, I suggest to rename > the files to FooWidget. Or a other good name. > If not, then we will rename the dialogs once they're ported. The Q* > naming will then indicate which dialog still needs to be ported. > > My personal preference is to do the renaming now. > > Abdel. > > -- Peter Kümmel
