Andre Poenitz schrieb:
SVN was _not_ broken.
First, you need not. svn help mv. URL->URL is the interesting part,
just rename one of the 'offending' files, run 'svn up' and be done.
TortoiseSVN suggested I should cleanup the tree but this doesn't help.
My SVN makes lots of troubles and after a checkout try I got a totally
broken tree.
[Just because TortoiseSVN bails out doesn't mean you have a broken SVN
tree... Anyway...]
If TortoiseSVN fails to checkout the tree is broken for me as result.
On Windows I have of course only FAT and NTFS, in my case only NTFS.
This 'of course' is a limitation imposed by yourself. There is no
problem to have e.g. ext2 partitions under Windows...
Come on, NTFS and FAT is used by all Win systems as standard so there's no discussion that we have
to take care of them.
I hope you can understand that I'm not very happy as I have three
times this week to check out the sources completely to a new tree
because it was broken after SVN checkout trys.
See above. I doubt your tree was actually broken. However, I understand
you are not happy that it did not work out-of-the-box _twice_ this week.
But you don't care about my problem, you just "broke" (tell it as you like) it again with
"Text.cpp".
I mean you know the problematic but still don't check if a renaming leads to two files with the same
name. Checking this could not be that difficult.
regards Uwe
