On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 01:00:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> What do you think? > > Andre> But I do not really want 'name_' in InstBase. _Every_ character > Andre> in math will contain that... > > Andre> Of course we could implement name_ several times fuirther down > Andre> in the hierarchy... > > Do we really need to _set_ the inset name? Couldn'it be just a virtual > method returning the name?
I seem to remember that there was at least one inset where it was actively set. But of couse, then only this inset needs the name_ member... Andre'
