Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Before making this decision, I would like to hear from Mac people
testing with Qt4.3 first. If the speed is acceptable we should
ditch it.
I have Qt-4.2.3, and on Intel Mac, there's no speed problem. (I
wouldn't expect PPC Mac to be much different, but I haven't tried.)
Yes but if we ditch the wide() thing you will get a full redraw for
each key stroke within inset. If you tell me that in mathed for
example, there is no time lag when typing then we can ditch it, if
not then we must keep it.
I meant that *with the patch* there's no speed problem: no lag at
all when typing (on Intel Mac; again, I don't anticipate a problem
for PPC either).
I 'm afraid we have a problem of communication here ;-). I know that
Juergen's patch won't affect performance. But I am afraid that the
alternative solution (ditching wide()) will.
Apparently we do! I'm now lost as to what you want from me.
Testing if typing lags behind within either a math or a caption inset.
If the delay is acceptable on a PPC platform we can ditch the wide() hack.
Abdel.
