>>>>> "uwestoehr" == uwestoehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
uwestoehr> Author: uwestoehr Date: Tue Apr 3 03:52:34 2007 New uwestoehr> Revision: 17700 uwestoehr> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17700 Log: support uwestoehr> for moderncv: Layout file and template as we currently have uwestoehr> no CV template but as discusses some times ago on the users uwestoehr> list we need one for the beginners. (The next days I'll uwestoehr> also prepare support for europecv, the second nicht CV uwestoehr> class that is also required to use in some fields.) uwestoehr> I hope I'm not too rash here. Uwe, please, could you at least discuss such classes before committing them? While moderncv indeed looks reasonably good (although with an awful syntax on the latex side), we try to have a policy to propose layouts that are something else than a repository for ERT trickery and huge preambles. In no particular order: - it seems to me that all the stuff you put in preamble could have its own layouts, declared as InTitle. - you do not provide Subsection - Are you sure that floats work? - Are you sure that counters are needed? - What about a Bibiiography environment? I understand that commands like \cventry and friends have an horrible syntax, but it would have been nice to try to handle them better. A class where 80% of the marking is done through ERT is a bit useless IMO. I am not saying we should not support cvmodern, but if we make a release of it as it is, we will be forced forever to support it, and I am not sure it is a good idea. JMarc
