On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Martin> It's about which "citation engine" to use. Before the patch,
> Martin> it is the one specified in the document's bufferparameters --
> Martin> i.e., stuff settable from Document Settings, the Bibliography
> Martin> tab. Manually choosing to use natbib, or not. That is the
> Martin> current situation: the natbib engine, allowing you to choose
> Martin> from multiple alternative formats like citep, citeauthor etc.,
> Martin> is only used if you specify it explicitly this way.
> 
> Martin> With the patch, this engine is also chosen if the _document
> Martin> class_ provides natbib (as indicated in the .layout file by
> Martin> the ProvidesNatbib switch).
> 
> This I understood.
> 
> Martin> The choice between numeric an authoryear in this part of the
> Martin> patch is something I don't understand really. That's what I
> Martin> asked about. I think the document class should provide this in
> Martin> this case, but it doesn't. Perhaps a FIXME would be called
> Martin> for.
> 
> For example, in the case of egs, only one in numeric or autoryear is
> available, right?

That's my understanding. Mostly these classes are for a specific journal
that _knows_ which of these two alternatives it is using. It's not
something the user can or should decide. E.g., in egs.cls I see no
natbib option, meaning the default, authoryear, is used.

- Martin

Attachment: pgpFvQEfgFpvG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to