Andre Poenitz wrote: > Note that a 'equal_ascii_no_case' would be sufficient and simplify the > logic (at least look more C++ish than the current -1/0/1 result.
The big advantage of compare_ascii_no_case is that it exists already. I am not going to implement yet another string comparison function, and I don't want to check whether compare_ascii_no_case could be replaced completely by equal_ascii_no_case either. Georg
