On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:09:19AM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Am 21.02.2007 um 22:51 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> >
> >Well... I am not sure about 'acceptable' cursor movement.
> >
> >The equivalent of \def\x#1#2#3{#3+#2+#1} is not exactly
> >'easy' to navigate. And that's only a 'linear' formula.
>
> Well, nobody stops you from defining it as \def\x#1#2#3{#1+#2+#3} if
> that is what you expect. The order in cursor navigation is the order
> of the arguments. That's what I find reasonable.
But the visual clue is completely wrong. The cursor jumps around
wildly. This is not in sync to the rest of mathed where cursor
navigation is 'visual', not 'logical'.
Andre'
