Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:17:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | José,
| > |
| > | can this go in? It moves the includes out of the lyx namespace and is
| > | needed for gcc 3.2. IMO it is a bug that later gcc accepts this code.
| >
| > I woulnd't go that far. But it is but that we have written the code in
| > the first place.
|
| Not really. The namespace was put in by a script...
Sure, then the script was buggy.
--
Lgb
